## A selection of problems in the theory of numbers by Waclaw Sierpinski, I. N. Sneddon, M. Stark

By Waclaw Sierpinski, I. N. Sneddon, M. Stark

Similar number theory books

Number Theory IV: Transcendental Numbers

This publication is a survey of crucial instructions of study in transcendental quantity thought - the idea of irrationality, transcendence, and algebraic independence of varied numbers. there's a specified emphasis at the transcendence homes of the values of distinctive features. The ebook comprises few entire proofs, yet relatively offers conceptual discussions of the primary rules in the back of the proofs.

Multiplicative Number Theory

The hot variation of this thorough exam of the distribution of top numbers in mathematics progressions bargains many revisions and corrections in addition to a brand new part recounting fresh works within the box. The booklet covers many classical effects, together with the Dirichlet theorem at the life of leading numbers in arithmetical progressions and the concept of Siegel.

Beilinson's Conjectures on Special Values of L-Functions

Beilinsons Conjectures on particular Values of L-Functions offers with Alexander Beilinsons conjectures on distinct values of L-functions. subject matters coated variety from Pierre Delignes conjecture on serious values of L-functions to the Deligne-Beilinson cohomology, besides the Beilinson conjecture for algebraic quantity fields and Riemann-Roch theorem.

Extra resources for A selection of problems in the theory of numbers

Sample text

Taking m = 37 and n = 15 gives (A, B, C) = (154, 231, 385) and d = 77. 6. Let a, b, and c be integers. Prove that gcd(a, b) gcd(b, c) gcd(c, a) gcd(a, b, c)2 and lcm(a, b) lcm(b, c) lcm(c, a) lcm(a, b, c)2 are equal integers. β γ β γ Solution. Let a = p1α1 · · · pnαn , b = p1 1 · · · pn n , and c = p1 1 · · · pn n , where p1 , . . , pn are distinct primes, and α1 , . . , αn , β1 , . . , βn , γ1 , . . , γn are nonnegative integers. Then n gcd(a, b) gcd(b, c) gcd(c, a) = gcd(a, b, c)2 min{αi ,βi } n min{βi ,γi } pi i=1 n pi i=1 n min{γi ,αi } pi i=1 2 min{αi ,βi ,γi } pi i=1 n min{αi ,βi }+min{βi ,γi }+min{γi ,αi }−2 min{αi ,βi ,γi } = pi i=1 and n lcm(a, b) lcm(b, c) lcm(c, a) = lcm(a, b, c)2 max{αi ,βi } n i=1 n max{βi ,γi } pi pi i=1 n i=1 2 max{αi ,βi ,γi } pi i=1 n = max{αi ,βi }+max{βi ,γi }+max{γi ,αi }−2 max{αi ,βi ,γi } pi i=1 max{γi ,αi } pi .

Let d be the greatest common divisor of k and p. Then k = k1 d, p = p1 d, for some integers p1 , k1 with gcd( p1 , k1 ) = 1. Hence k1 a = p1 b, and since gcd(a, b) = 1, we have k1 = b, p1 = a. This is false, because k1 < b. It follows that one of the numbers from (1) has the remainder 1 when divided by b, so there is u ∈ {1, 2, . . , b − 1} such that au = bv + 1 and the lemma is proved. In fact, there are infinitely many positive integers u and v satisfying this property, that is, u = u 0 +kb, v = v0 +ka, where u 0 and v0 satisfy au 0 −bv0 = 1.

M k are pairwise relatively prime, then a ≡ b (mod m i ), i = 1, . . , k, if and only if a ≡ b (mod m 1 , . . , m k ). 30 I Fundamentals, 1. Divisibility Let us prove the last property. From a ≡ b (mod m i ), i = 1, . . , k, it follows that m i | a − b, i = 1, . . , k. Hence a − b is a common multiple of m 1 , . . , m k , and so lcm(m 1 , . . , m k ) | a − b. That is, a ≡ b (mod lcm(m 1 , . . , m k )). Conversely, from a ≡ b (mod lcm(m 1 , . . , m k )), and the fact that each m i divides lcm(m 1 , .